Search for: All records

Speculative execution attacks leverage the speculative and out-of-order execution features in modern computer processors to access secret data or execute code that should not be executed. Secret information can then be leaked through a covert channel. While software patches can be installed for mitigation on existing hardware, these solutions can incur big performance overhead. Hardware mitigation is being studied extensively by the computer architecture community. It has the benefit of preserving software compatibility and the potential for much smaller performance overhead than software solutions. This paper presents a systematization of the hardware defenses against speculative execution attacks that have been proposed. We show that speculative execution attacks consist of 6 critical attack steps. We propose defense strategies, each of which prevents a critical attack step from happening, thus preventing the attack from succeeding. We then summarize 20 hardware defenses and overhead-reducing features that have been proposed. We show that each defense proposed can be classified under one of our defense strategies, which also explains why it can thwart the attack from succeeding. We discuss the scope of the defenses, their performance overhead, and the security-performance trade-offs that can be made. 

Spectre and Meltdown attacks and their variants exploit hardware performance optimization features to cause security breaches. Secret information is accessed and leaked through covert or side channels. New attack variants keep appearing and we do not have a systematic way to capture the critical characteristics of these attacks and evaluate why they succeed or fail.In this paper, we provide a new attack-graph model for reasoning about speculative execution attacks. We model attacks as ordered dependency graphs, and prove that a race condition between two nodes can occur if there is a missing dependency edge between them. We define a new concept, “security dependency”, between a resource access and its prior authorization operation. We show that a missing security dependency is equivalent to a race condition between authorization and access, which is a root cause of speculative execution attacks. We show detailed examples of how our attack graph models the Spectre and Meltdown attacks, and is generalizable to all the attack variants published so far. This attack model is also very useful for identifying new attacks and for generalizing defense strategies. We identify several defense strategies with different performance-security tradeoffs. We show that the defenses proposed so far all fit under one of our defense strategies. We also explain how attack graphs can be constructed and point to this as promising future work for tool designers 

Rootkits are malware that attempt to compromise the system’s functionalities while hiding their existence. Various rootkits have been proposed as well as different software defenses, but only very few hardware defenses. We position hardware-enhanced rootkit defenses as an interesting research opportunity for computer architects, especially as many new hardware defenses for speculative execution attacks are being actively considered. We first describe different techniques used by rootkits and their prime targets in the operating system. We then try to shed insights on what the main challenges are in providing a rootkit defense, and how these may be overcome. We show how a hypervisor-based defense can be implemented, and provide a full prototype implementation in an open-source cloud computing platform, OpenStack. We evaluate the performance overhead of different defense mechanisms. Finally, we point to some research opportunities for enhancing resilience to rootkit-like attacks in the hardware architecture. 

Controllers of security-critical cyber-physical systems, like the power grid, are a very important class of computer systems. Attacks against the control code of a power-grid system, especially zero-day attacks, can be catastrophic. Earlier detection of the anomalies can prevent further damage. However, detecting zero-day attacks is extremely challenging because they have no known code and have unknown behavior. Furthermore, if data collected from the controller is transferred to a server through networks for analysis and detection of anomalous behavior, this creates a very large attack surface and also delays detection. In order to address this problem, we propose Reconstruction Error Distribution (RED) of Hardware Performance Counters (HPCs), and a data-driven defense system based on it. Specifically, we first train a temporal deep learning model, using only normal HPC readings from legitimate processes that run daily in these power-grid systems, to model the normal behavior of the power-grid controller. Then, we run this model using real-time data from commonly available HPCs. We use the proposed RED to enhance the temporal deep learning detection of anomalous behavior, by estimating distribution deviations from the normal behavior with an effective statistical test. Experimental results on a real power-grid controller show that we can detect anomalous behavior with high accuracy (>99.9%), nearly zero false positives and short (<360ms) latency.